Curiosity got the best of me, so I ran a quick news search on all the ACORN articles that reference the term isolated. Just that term. Nothing on "denial" or "refuted", just isolated. I was curious as that seemed to be their go-term venacular when referring to all the alleged voter registration fraud.
- From ACORN, a mighty GOP fight Politico.com May 9, 2009
- Catholic bishops cut off ACORN funding The Associated Press November 12, 2008
- Hardly historic fraud; Editorials; McCain's warning on ACORN is oberblown; Editorial The Register-Guard (Eugene, OR)
- Accused Registration Group Has No Voter Drives Here; ACORN Engaging in Fraud, Republicans Claim The Washington Post October 18, 2008
- ACORN falls close to chad territory The Australian October 17, 2008
- ACORN sign-ups here seem legitimate; Nearly 40% of vote forms denied, but registrar sees no intentional foul The Houston Chronicle October 16, 2008
- Party is over for ACORN, Democrats Columbia Daily Tribune (Missouri) October 3, 2008
- ACORN feud over suspicious voter cards The Miami Herald September 25, 2008
Eight. Some may say--is that all?! What's the big deal? The big deal is that most media outlets weren't covering this story. Some were even told to "kill the story" (NYT-go figure). How can you allege these are isolated when you continually use that specific term to refute alleged fraud in a new state or city? Apparently they don't understand the meaning of the word. Can we use some of that taxpayer money we're shelling out to get them Hooked-on-Phonics?
Let's put our game-face on with these scumbag lunatics. The new scapegoat in all of this: Republicans. They are just sore losers. Nothing to see here--let's move on! Let's not pay any attention to the fact President Thinned Skinned and the dipshits in Congress have made them eligible for $8 billion more in taxpayer dollars ("B" as in Barry. Or "B" as in barium enema. Actually I think they are one in the same).
No comments:
Post a Comment